Should Great Britain Put Out a side at the 2012 Olympics? WITH POLL
Should Britain have a unified futbol team at the 2012 Olympics? I think that they should -- the Olympics are in London, the sport is massive there and FIFA have assured the home nations all will be fine afterwards.
The Guardian is running a debate here. Here are a couple of money quotes:
Yes: "Why does a country, rich with footballing talent and success, fail to put forward a men's and women's team for the Olympic Games when it's a perfect opportunity to showcase our skills and win? Doesn't really make sense, does it?"
No: "If we were to merge as one football nation, others would point out - and probably with justification - that our level of representation was unjust and ask that we voted as one. That would have massive implications for our ability to influence Fifa issues and our standing; a merged football team would therefore attack our constitutional rights. The possibility beyond that, of course, is that people would question why we retained individual national football teams and country-by-country representation in European football at all. It is a dangerous road to go down."
"Fortunately I know this won't happen. One way or another there will be a GB team at the 2012 Games. The only question is, will they be a truly British team or an England XI playing under the union flag?"
Please vote in our poll!
0 recs |
3
comments
Read Related
Comments
Solution
Have a home nations tournament, the winner represents GB at the Olympics.
Blame my wife!
by sir eccles on Sep 13, 2008 4:34 PM BST 0 recs
Why not just have them all go through olympic qualifying like every other team in the world?
by JasonB on Sep 18, 2008 4:37 PM BST 0 recs






